Treating Reoccurring UTI’s caused by Uropathogenic E.Coli with mannosides, Group 17

  • Group 17

Published on Apr 12, 2018Group 17
The topic of this video is the increasing prevalence of reoccurring UTI’s and the antibiotic resistance crisis. We will discuss experiments that have been undertaken that could provide solutions to this issue.

3.7(74.4%) 25 votes
This entry was posted in mannosides and uropathogenic E. coli. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Treating Reoccurring UTI’s caused by Uropathogenic E.Coli with mannosides, Group 17

  1. Liya says:

    you have a good introduction that gives a good background into the topic. I also like how you incorporate the applications of the results and what further research can be done

  2. Daniel says:

    Pretty good, but there was no clear mention of how what we learned in class relates to this research.

  3. Rahul says:

    The video was informative and content wise solid. However, the lighting and animations were slightly lacking. Nevertheless, a solid video.

  4. Brialisse says:

    Concepts from the research are explained well – easy to understand. I agree that a connection to course topics should have been expressed more, but great job summing up the data.

  5. Ariel says:

    Research topic explained well, and concepts nicely presented. Video quality could be a little better.

  6. Dezarae says:

    The video is kinda cute, but why is she in the video. There is just enough detail to understand the information.

  7. Jazmin says:

    Great script, images did not match very well to the content discussed. However, conclusion was strong.

  8. Harrison says:

    audio is good and not too hard to follow. I liked how you drew out he graphs which allowed me to understand them better. Good video!

  9. Kayla says:

    The script is very good and clear to understand however, the visuals are not very clear and could have been better. But overall, the content is expressed well.

  10. Lucas says:

    The content is good and fits with the images displayed; however, you should include more of what we learned in class to this video.

  11. Maria says:

    Good content but visuals were not as clear and there wasn’t a connection to what we learned in class.

  12. Gabriella says:

    I felt as though the visuals were good, although they may not have always matched what was being discussed. I thought the lighting was a little too dark for the video, but overall well done!

  13. Eric says:

    The research topic was thoroughly and well explained. On the other hand, the video could be improved by discarding the drawers from the frame as they take away from their drawings as well as maybe freezing the frame on once their drawing is complete, so the viewer can digest what they are seeing.

  14. Brian says:

    The narration and visuals were good at explaining the topic, but the dark frames and shaky camera detracted from the visual quality of the video.

  15. Maya says:

    they set up the information very well by giving a lot of good background information. The actual content was also very informative and helpful.

  16. Zachary says:

    The content was good, but the odd lighting in the video made it more difficult to focus on the visuals.

  17. William says:

    Most of the required information was there, but the board illustrations were not as helpful in explaining the information as they could have been. Overall pretty good, but could have been better with better coordination between the narration and the illustrations.

  18. Brice says:

    Cool idea and overall well executed, but the audio being stereo-panned hard left was a bit distracting. The content was pretty clear overall.

  19. Molly says:

    I liked how the illustrations were drawn as the video progressed, but I felt that this video was lacking in the background information and how it relates to the concepts we learned in class.

  20. Hyunwoo says:

    Interesting video, although the lightings could have been a bit better. The information itself was well explained.

  21. Sidney says:

    It is very interesting matter, but at the same time, it was boring to watch. you should have done a better job on the presentation. good job

  22. Pragya says:

    Good delivery of content. Could improve upon lighting and animations a little, but overall, good job!

  23. Zain says:

    The information provided was great, but the presentation hurts your ability to fully explain your topic. Not bad though.

  24. Soohyon says:

    The information was explained well but the visuals aren’t the best.

  25. Cori says:

    I think the content and explanation is good, but the video quality is not very professional.

  26. Sahil says:

    Great ideas but the content could have been more on topic. The video was a little dark and quality could have been better.

  27. Gabriel says:

    Audio seems a little bit odd (at least for me), but lighting and camera were not that good for the video. Drawings were drawn and then disappeared about the time they were done, not giving much time to take in the full drawing. Explanations were good, but presentation of the information was not executed amazingly.

  28. Adam says:

    Overall good video and informative, but very hard to see what was written. The lighting, and focus could be improved, and perhaps avoid blocking drawings with one’s body. Perhaps the narration could have been rehearsed a few more times. A difficult topic well explained however.

  29. Harsh says:

    I think the lighting could have been improved here as it kinds of blurs some parts of the video!

  30. Samantha says:

    Drawings weren’t super formal but got the point across

  31. Madison says:

    Good intention of video, however the lighting jeopardized the quality of your video and distracted from the quality of the content. Good effort though!

  32. Natalie says:

    This is a difficult topic and you explained it well! Nice!

Leave a Reply